
rich1uk wrote:its not made a difference to the decision but that was clearly a no ball
couldn't believe it when the TV umpire said he cant tell if there was anything behind the line or not so had to give the benefit of the doubt to the bowler
dan08 wrote:rich1uk wrote:its not made a difference to the decision but that was clearly a no ball
couldn't believe it when the TV umpire said he cant tell if there was anything behind the line or not so had to give the benefit of the doubt to the bowler
Isn't it any part of the heel so some was still behind?
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Sixty years on the clock for TMS. Have got out of the habit of always listening (either it feels like it hasn't changed enough when I'm listening to Boycott and BLowers, or too much when it's an unwelcome unfamiliar voice). But at times it is still glorious. Surely a candidate for being one of the UK's all time great broadcasts.
rich1uk wrote:dan08 wrote:rich1uk wrote:its not made a difference to the decision but that was clearly a no ball
couldn't believe it when the TV umpire said he cant tell if there was anything behind the line or not so had to give the benefit of the doubt to the bowler
Isn't it any part of the heel so some was still behind?
there was nothing behind the line that i saw, i didn't even think it was a hard call that it was a no-ball
Aidan11 wrote:Bumble shocked at the over rate and I have to agree.
Its atrocious.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests