Durham Match Thread 2018

county and domestic cricket around the world

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Mon Jun 25, 2018 11:42 am

westoelad wrote:
captaincolly wrote:
Durhamfootman wrote:Colly was hugely critical of the pink ball, if I remember correctly.

perhaps scathing would be a better word

Yep. Think John Hastings ( who was playing for Worcs ) was also very critical - Lewis said at the forum he doesn't like if either.
In fact I don't remember any positive feedback at all from around the circuit...so naturally FTECB continue with the experiment. Brilliant scheduling too to have these matches played when the sun doesn't set until after the close of play.

It actually would have been brilliant scheduling if they'd play as normal with a red ball with normal light. If bad natural light stops play then make up for it by starting earlier next day.
Offer entry after 4pm for £5 with accompanied kids free. Make a kill on refreshments etc with kids in.

Good idea. Needs some innovative thinking but FTECB don't do that.
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Mon Jun 25, 2018 1:43 pm

No uncontested toss. Warcs won it and are batting.
Davies and Pringle in for Poynter and Coughlin.
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Mon Jun 25, 2018 2:27 pm

No wickets after almost half an hour and I've already got a bad feeling about this!
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Mon Jun 25, 2018 2:32 pm

captaincolly wrote:No wickets after almost half an hour and I've already got a bad feeling about this!

17/1. Must get rid of Bell before he settles.
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:27 pm

Bell gone to Salisbury. 52/2. Now get rid of Trott! It'll probably be one of those times where the ones we regard as the dangermen fail but someone relatively unheralded gets a hundred.
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:34 pm

We could do without Rimmington going at almost 5 an over when the overall rate is under 3.
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Mon Jun 25, 2018 5:44 pm

A wicket straight after the break but once again not followed up and another decent partnership established!
It would have been interesting (if that's the right word) to see how many wickets we'd have lost by this stage.
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Mon Jun 25, 2018 5:49 pm

captaincolly wrote:A wicket straight after the break but once again not followed up and another decent partnership established!
It would have been interesting (if that's the right word) to see how many wickets we'd have lost by this stage.

And of course after saying that they have taken a wicket. Salisbury again, Trott still there though 130/4.
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:41 pm

Warwickshire slowly progressing towards a big score. It must mean conditions are excellent for batting so we will also prosper with the bat. What could possibly go wrong.
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Mon Jun 25, 2018 8:23 pm

This bowling attack is far too weak - Rimmington as one of three specialist seamers and a non-spinning spinner. No wonder Warwickshire wanted to bat.
Even worse is - despite only having those 3 main bowlers - the batting looks weak too. :horse
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby Durhamfootman » Mon Jun 25, 2018 9:10 pm

Trotty still there, and now joined by Mr it's Durham so I want my obligatory double ton Barker. 500 for 6 by lunch tomorrow, I reckon
2025 County Championship D1 FL, County Championship D2 FL, Football Prediction League
2024 County Championship D1 FL, Indian Premier League FL , Big Bash League FL
2023 County Championship D1 FL, WI-SA combined FL, Big Bash League FL
2022 County Championship D1 FL, T20 Blast FL , Ashes FL
2021 All Year Fantasy Competition, ICC T20 World Cup FL, Big Bash League FL
2020 SA-England combined FL, Caribbean Premier League FL
2019 NZ-England test FL, WI-India combined FL, The Open Golf FL, French Open Tennis FL, Sheffield Shield FL,
Players Championship Golf FL, Women's National Cricket League FL, Women's Big Bash League FL
2018 All Year Fantasy Competition
2017 The Open Golf FL
2016 Australia-South Africa test FL, County Championship D1 FL, Indian Premier League FL
2015 County Fantasy Manager, Big Bash League FL
2014 WI-England test and ODI FL, County Championship D2 FL
2013 County Championship D2 FL
2012 Twenty20 Cup FL
Durhamfootman
 
Posts: 72079
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:53 pm
Location: Chester-le-Street
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Mon Jun 25, 2018 9:29 pm

297/5 at the close. Only positive is the slow rate of scoring but 5 wickets is a poor return. Can't see how this attack will ever bowl a good side out cheaply unless conditions are in their favour.
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby westoelad » Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:05 am

captaincolly wrote:297/5 at the close. Only positive is the slow rate of scoring but 5 wickets is a poor return. Can't see how this attack will ever bowl a good side out cheaply unless conditions are in their favour.

Slow pitch so you need to be patient!_- that's us knackered.
Reckon Salisbury has shown enough to earn a longer contract before someone else does. Equally whoever recommended signing Rimmington clearly hadn't done their homework.
westoelad
 
Posts: 7642
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:16 am

westoelad wrote:
captaincolly wrote:297/5 at the close. Only positive is the slow rate of scoring but 5 wickets is a poor return. Can't see how this attack will ever bowl a good side out cheaply unless conditions are in their favour.

Slow pitch so you need to be patient!_- that's us knackered.
Reckon Salisbury has shown enough to earn a longer contract before someone else does. Equally whoever recommended signing Rimmington clearly hadn't done their homework.

I agree, Salisbury has been very impressive. The Rimmington signing was a strange one, he might surprise us and be great in the T20's but I doubt it! He's almost totally ineffective in FC cricket as a bowler though on what we've seen so far.
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

Postby captaincolly » Tue Jun 26, 2018 2:19 pm

50 partnership between Trott and Barker ( who was dropped on 0 ) and they seem to be scoring more quickly now.
Extras mounting up too - 22 so far.
captaincolly
 
Posts: 39559
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

PreviousNext

Return to Domestic Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests