st_brendy wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:how are we fancying our chances, tonight?
So long as you don't bat Stokes down at no.8, use nine different bowlers, and go all-out-pace in the PP, you've got a chance.
st_brendy wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:how are we fancying our chances, tonight?
So long as you don't bat Stokes down at no.8, use nine different bowlers, and go all-out-pace in the PP, you've got a chance.
captaincolly wrote:st_brendy wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:how are we fancying our chances, tonight?
So long as you don't bat Stokes down at no.8, use nine different bowlers, and go all-out-pace in the PP, you've got a chance.
Have you been eavesdropping on the team planning meeting!
st_brendy wrote:captaincolly wrote:st_brendy wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:how are we fancying our chances, tonight?
So long as you don't bat Stokes down at no.8, use nine different bowlers, and go all-out-pace in the PP, you've got a chance.
Have you been eavesdropping on the team planning meeting!
Seven bowlers. So not far off from nine.
What is Pringle like with the bat in t20? If nothing special, then couldn't his two overs have been bowled by Smith, with an extra batter coming in instead?

st_brendy wrote:captaincolly wrote:st_brendy wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:how are we fancying our chances, tonight?
So long as you don't bat Stokes down at no.8, use nine different bowlers, and go all-out-pace in the PP, you've got a chance.
Have you been eavesdropping on the team planning meeting!
Seven bowlers. So not far off from nine.
What is Pringle like with the bat in t20? If nothing special, then couldn't his two overs have been bowled by Smith, with an extra batter coming in instead?
st_brendy wrote:st_brendy wrote:captaincolly wrote:st_brendy wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:how are we fancying our chances, tonight?
So long as you don't bat Stokes down at no.8, use nine different bowlers, and go all-out-pace in the PP, you've got a chance.
Have you been eavesdropping on the team planning meeting!
Seven bowlers. So not far off from nine.
What is Pringle like with the bat in t20? If nothing special, then couldn't his two overs have been bowled by Smith, with an extra batter coming in instead?
19 off 20, in a run chase with wickets in hand, probably gives me my answer.
Better off getting out first ball.
captaincolly wrote:st_brendy wrote:captaincolly wrote:st_brendy wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:how are we fancying our chances, tonight?
So long as you don't bat Stokes down at no.8, use nine different bowlers, and go all-out-pace in the PP, you've got a chance.
Have you been eavesdropping on the team planning meeting!
Seven bowlers. So not far off from nine.
What is Pringle like with the bat in t20? If nothing special, then couldn't his two overs have been bowled by Smith, with an extra batter coming in instead?
I'd have thought so.
Out tonight so not following this closely but no chance of getting these runs imo unless Stokes gets half of them!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests