Durhamfootman wrote:bigfluffylemon wrote:Tight game, but England have seemed to me to be a bit sub-par with the bat and in the field all tournament. I can't see them getting through the semi, and I think that would be a fair reflection - 4th best in the world.
It's T20, so there's never a foregone conclusion, but I think England will have to play a blinder to beat India.
so do I
but, I'll re-iterate... India only managed one partnership themselves against Australia, albeit a belter. Early wickets in the semi and India might look vulnerable.... it feels to me as if all India's runs are with Mandhana, Raj and Kaur. Get them early......... hey, it's T20.... anything can happen

Durhamfootman wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:bigfluffylemon wrote:Tight game, but England have seemed to me to be a bit sub-par with the bat and in the field all tournament. I can't see them getting through the semi, and I think that would be a fair reflection - 4th best in the world.
It's T20, so there's never a foregone conclusion, but I think England will have to play a blinder to beat India.
so do I
but, I'll re-iterate... India only managed one partnership themselves against Australia, albeit a belter. Early wickets in the semi and India might look vulnerable.... it feels to me as if all India's runs are with Mandhana, Raj and Kaur. Get them early......... hey, it's T20.... anything can happen
who knew that India would help out by leaving one of those 3 batters on the bench?
odd decision
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests