Just to return to the exchange I had with BFL regarding the Australian selectors ; as I see Dean Jones has also tipped a bucket on them in this morning's
Age...
I did not mean to imply wholehearted approval of their performance this year : just that I don't believe they are
deliberately holding seats open for the return of the Sandpaper Mob (who will hardly be lacking vacancies to fill in any case)
I think they have in fact been trying , first and foremost , to pick a side that can compete with India (as they should) The messing about with the batting has arisen partly from the disappointing - if perhaps foreseeable - returns from Finch as opener following his qualified and misleading success in UAE ; and partly from the very real need for a fifth bowler on the lifeless Melbourne track... M Marsh was actually the logical selection for the MCG Test -
from the squad.. And equally a logical omission for Sydney (whether Labuschagne was a better choice than , say , Maxwell , as a replacement , one can debate.) Could Finch have just moved down to five and Handscomb remained playing big Bash ? Certainly ; but I suspect they think Handscomb is a better prospect and are reluctant to discard him - yet.
When S Marsh is an automatic choice as a key batsman you may just have to admit the cupboard is at least thinly stocked
The main thing I'd like to see change is abandonment of the love affair with M Marsh as premier all rounder . I understand he's been specifically endorsed in that position despite scant evidence in favor ; but have to question whether Stoinis , for example , would do any worse ? In fairness the alternatives aren't jumping up everywhere (Hilton Cartwright ? And was it only yesterday lots of people - some on here - were advocating James Faulkner who now doesn't get a game with Tasmania ?) Proper all rounders don't grow on trees.
The Sri Lanka Tests present an opportunity for team building . Would be disrespectful and probably inaccurate to say they could put out NSW seconds and prosper ; but you'd think some experimentation could be allowed. Perhaps a Marsh-free squad allowing Head and Handscomb to go ; ahem : head to head for a middle order spot ? With Harris opening along with Renshaw , Burns , Bancroft - whoever you think might be the best bet as a future opener ( even if Warner is welcomed back - with perhaps less than open arms - he probably isn't going to be around that much longer)
Just don't expect miracles overnight. Truth is Australian batting is going through a dry patch right now and the next Steve Smith might be a little way off...