Arthur Crabtree wrote:In a way, maybe it's a fair deal if they throw away some games using the same tactics that win them some. But attempting to chase this total was folly. A senior player/coach might have realised
Better teams are going to punish your bad decisions more than average ones, and England's tactical successes have to be quantified along with their major priorities in test cricket. If England lose this series and the away Ashes, no one is going to remember winning at home to Zimbabwe, Ireland, WI or SL, the whole era will default to a giant failure. So I ask myself, given that context of priorities, where does England's Bazball attitude pay, and where does it cost? The Ashes are the prime series for England. England did not beat Australia in 2023, which given the context of how tough it is to beat marquee sides away in modern test cricket, is a bad result for England - Australia haven't won a series in England for 24 years, so England failed to win a series they were favourites in.
You ask, why? Well, in the first test they unnecessarily and surprisingly declared on day 1 with the world's number one ranked bat on 120* and in a late order partnership of 50 odd runs that Australia were struggling to break - Australia then won the game by 2 wickets. A tight match decided by England leaving free runs on the board that should/would have probably changed the result. In the test that followed, when faced with chasing Australia's target of 380 with bad weather around and not much play expected on day 5, they came out blazing and lost 4 wickets in the first 10 overs...... the match ended at 18h35 on Day 5 with England all out, and the best part of 250 runs scored by batsman slogging. Literally only minutes from safety on a dark, wet day where only 35 odd overs have been bowled. So yeah, England's top priority series - they were 2-0 down as a result of these decisions. It cost them the series.
What else do we judge England on? India test series.... well we drew at home in 2022, and got thumped 4-1 away recently against a crumbling old side that the Kiwi's whitewashed. We are now being outplayed over two tests by a side supposed to be at the start of a deep transition - given how badly modern day India have played at stages in England, not to beat this side would be worrying.
After that, I'd say England sides are judged on winning against Asian sides away - we just lost to a Pakistan side that had gone 7 odd matches defeated, and who have been beaten at home in the last 2-3 years by NZ, AUS and BD. This was failure - worth noting England won the test with Stokes not in the side, and lost both after he came back. After that, maybe ending England's poor run in the Windies away? Again, lost in 2022.
Getting to a WTC final? Failed in the last cycle.
Beating a good side of the moment in a less than important series in historical context (Ie New Zealand) - yeah, we did well out there and won the series recently, this is a tick in the box. Worth noting however we did play NZ under Stokes/McCullum twice - the first series was thrown away when England lost by 1 run in a match they again unnecessarily and idiotically declared their first innings over with runs still on the board. So even that comes with an *****