Iamthewalrus wrote:If Woakes' bowling isn't good enough for ODI cricket then how will it be good enough for test cricket?
Iamthewalrus wrote:If Woakes' bowling isn't good enough for ODI cricket then how will it be good enough for test cricket?
Kim wrote:Iamthewalrus wrote:If Woakes' bowling isn't good enough for ODI cricket then how will it be good enough for test cricket?
He hasnt got enough variety - eg a good slower ball in one days yet. What's a nagging economical length and line in FC cricket can become predictable and hittable in the short game. Hes learning.
Iamthewalrus wrote:Kim wrote:Iamthewalrus wrote:If Woakes' bowling isn't good enough for ODI cricket then how will it be good enough for test cricket?
He hasnt got enough variety - eg a good slower ball in one days yet. What's a nagging economical length and line in FC cricket can become predictable and hittable in the short game. Hes learning.
Do you think he's good enough for tests?
Kim wrote:Id bet Woakes is there in 2015. By then he will be batting 5 or 6 for Warwicks (might be at 6 this summer) and his one day bowling will have improved. And if Stokes bowling come on - Im guessing he will be in by then for his batting anyway - we will really have some options. We'll bat very deep and wont be carrying a 5th or 6th bowler.
Be nice if one of the inevitable emergees is a left arm quick
We've practically won it already.

Arthur Crabtree wrote:I'm a five bowler poster, but there is a risk that you can start picking bowlers who don't deserve to be in the side, because they can bat at seven, or balance an attack in Asia. Bresnan gets in the side as a bowler. But if he's injured, do you pick a bowler for his batting?
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests