captaincolly wrote:Quite the collapse this morning!
captaincolly wrote:westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:Or maybe we're wrong - 104 overs scheduled for tomorrow according to cricinfo.
I'm of the " no catch up overs permitted on the final day" belief.
I thought so too. Could still be an interesting day, wonder what the plan will be for the declaration? Need to come out all guns blazing in the morning . Bowling them out in a couple of sessions is a realistic- if unlikely- prospect.

westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:Or maybe we're wrong - 104 overs scheduled for tomorrow according to cricinfo.
I'm of the " no catch up overs permitted on the final day" belief.
I thought so too. Could still be an interesting day, wonder what the plan will be for the declaration? Need to come out all guns blazing in the morning . Bowling them out in a couple of sessions is a realistic- if unlikely- prospect.
I think the guns were on friendly fire
Yes! I was expecting bowling for an hour or so before lunch ...following a declaration!captaincolly wrote:Need a couple of wickets, draw looking likely at this stage- whereas Notts are going to win.
westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:Need a couple of wickets, draw looking likely at this stage- whereas Notts are going to win.
As are Worcs
Durhamfootman wrote:and as well as being hopeless against spin, we appear to be toothless against obdurate batting.
I know I keep bashing on about it, and have been bashing on about it for years, but it's our lack of a quality spinner, someone who can run amok on day 4, instil some panic into opposition lower orders and turn draws into wins, that keeps on haunting us. Harmer would have run through this lot in short order, leaving Essex to knock off 30 runs. We haven't had a spinner who could do that since Blackwell left
I know nothing really, so if I can see it why can't the Durham management?
westoelad wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:and as well as being hopeless against spin, we appear to be toothless against obdurate batting.
I know I keep bashing on about it, and have been bashing on about it for years, but it's our lack of a quality spinner, someone who can run amok on day 4, instil some panic into opposition lower orders and turn draws into wins, that keeps on haunting us. Harmer would have run through this lot in short order, leaving Essex to knock off 30 runs. We haven't had a spinner who could do that since Blackwell left
I know nothing really, so if I can see it why can't the Durham management?
Possibly they can but it's not easy to find one. However, we aren't going to win many games with a 1 dimensional attack like in this game nor will we develop a spinner if we either select one and don't bowl him, Trevaskis,or don't select him, Drissel. As you say,DF, the problem has been with us long enough.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests